The first of these issues on this short list start with the health of the frontcourt. Center Andrew Bogut's history of being injured is long and was untimely last year in the playoffs. People only seem to recognize his talents as a defensive anchor but he means a lot more to the team than just that. His sturdy screens and superb passing skill keeps the half court offense flowing as well. With all these factors considered it is pertinent that an injury does not hamper them again. This would be less of an issue if their backup center had not been hurt for most of the past two years as well. Festus Ezeli has similar positive qualities on the defensive end as a good rim protector with nice size and a strong build. David Lee has also had some bad luck the last couple of years but other than that has proven to be rather durable.
Because of these obvious issues, many wanted the Warriors to make a move for a center in case there is another injury to Bogut. On paper that makes sense but what defensive centers were available that could come in mid season and be accustomed to what the Warriors want to accomplish on the floor? Someone of that caliber requires size, toughness, a high basketball IQ, must be able to set good screens, and most importantly, not mess up the chemistry that got them in such good standing already. No one on the trade market really fits that bill. Centers are a scarcity in this league so finding an adequate one is incredibly difficult. Ezeli already possesses most of those qualities so the player that's desired is technically already on the roster and just needs to get healthy. Why trade for something you already have?
Steve Kerr and his coaching staff have done an astounding job of capitalizing on every player's specialities by implementing an offense that relies heavily on player and ball movement, a fast pace, and team chemistry. A trade runs the risk of ruining all of that. |
The only other weakness I found is Golden State's free throw shooting. It is not recognized as much because of the Splash Brothers but apart from those two sharpshooters, the work from the charity stripe is deficient. This need was never addressed nor did it need to be. It's quite minor if you consider the fact that their offense is second in the league and that their top two scorers excel in that department. Come playoff time this may have to be addressed in closing situations but it has not proven to be too big of a problem over the course of the regular season as of yet.
And again, if this article does not prove my point to you: 43-9, 43-9, 43-9.
0 comments:
Post a Comment